|
|
|
5种不同方法治疗尿路感染的疗效:一项随机对照试验 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effectiveness of five different approaches in management of urinary tract infection: randomised controlled trial |
|
|
|
|
|
Little P, Moore MV, Turner S 2010/8/19 14:02:24 |
|
|
|
【发表评论】 【全球专家评论】
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
打印|
推荐给好友
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BMJ, 2010, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View at Publisher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective:
To assess the impact of different management strategies in urinary tract infections.
Design:
Randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
Primary care.
Participants:
309 non-pregnant women aged 18-70 presenting with suspected urinary tract infection.
Intervention:
Patients were randomised to five management approaches: empirical antibiotics; empirical delayed (by 48 hours) antibiotics; or targeted antibiotics based on a symptom score (two or more of urine cloudiness, urine smell, nocturia, or dysuria), a dipstick result (nitrite or both leucocytes and blood), or a positive result on midstream urine analysis. Self help advice was controlled in each group.
Main Outcome Measures:
Symptom severity (days 2 to 4) and duration, and use of antibiotics.
Results:
Patients had 3.5days of moderately bad symptoms if they took antibiotics immediately. There were no significant differences in duration or severity of symptoms (mean frequency of symptoms on a 0 to 6 scale: immediate antibiotics 2.15, midstream urine 2.08, dipstick 1.74, symptom score 1.77, delayed antibiotics 2.11; likelihood ratio test for the five groups P=0.177). There were differences in antibiotic use (immediate antibiotics 97%, midstream urine 81%, dipstick 80%, symptom score 90%, delayed antibiotics 77%; P=0.011) and in sending midstream urine samples (immediate antibiotics 23%, midstream urine 89%, dipstick 36%, symptom score 33%, delayed antibiotics 15%; P<0.001). Patients who waited at least 48 hours to start taking antibiotics reconsulted less (hazard ratio 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.89), P=0.014) but on average had symptoms for 37% longer than those taking immediate antibiotics (incident rate ratio 1.37 (1.11 to 1.68), P=0.003), particularly the midstream urine group (73% longer, 22% to 140%; none of the other groups had more than 22% longer duration).
Conclusion:
All management strategies achieve similar symptom control. There is no advantage in routinely sending midstream urine samples for testing, and antibiotics targeted with dipstick tests with a delayed prescription as backup, or empirical delayed prescription, can help to reduce antibiotic use.
Study Registration:
National Research Register N0484094184 ISRCTN: 03525333. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
评论
|
|
|
请登录后发表评论,点击此处登录。
|
|
|
疾病资源中心
病例分析 [栏目介绍]
王燕燕 王曙
上海交通大学附属瑞金医院内分泌科
患者,女,69岁。2009年1月无明显诱因下出现乏力,当时程度较轻,未予以重视。2009年3月患者乏力症状加重,尿色逐渐加深,大便习惯改变,颜色变淡。4月18日入我院感染科治疗,诉轻度头晕、心慌,体重减轻10kg。无肝区疼痛,无发热,无腹痛、腹泻、腹胀、里急后重,无恶性、呕吐等。入院半月前于外院就诊,查肝功能:ALT 601IU/L,AST 785IU/L,TBIL 97.7umol/L,白蛋白 41g/L,甲状腺功能:游离T3 30.6pmol/L,游离T4 51.9pmol/L,心电图示快速房颤。
医学数据库
|