|
|
|
房室结消融可预测接受心脏再同步化治疗的房颤患者的生存获益 |
|
|
|
|
|
Atrioventricular nodal ablation predicts survival benefit in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy |
|
|
|
|
|
Dong K, Shen W-K, Powell BD, Dong Y-X, Rea RF, Friedman PA, Hodge DO, Wiste HJ, Webster T, Hayes DL, Cha Y-M 2010/9/26 9:29:00 |
|
【发表评论】
|
|
|
|
打印|
推荐给好友
|
|
|
Heart Rhythm, 2010, Volume 7, Issue 9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) benefits patients with advanced heart failure. The role of atrioventricular nodal (AVN) ablation in improving CRT outcomes, including survival benefit in CRT recipients with atrial fibrillation, is uncertain. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of AVN ablation on clinical and survival outcomes in a large atrial fibrillation and heart failure population that met the current indication for CRT and to determine whether AVN ablation is an independent predictor of survival in CRT recipients. Methods: Of 154 patients with atrial fibrillation who received CRT-D, 45 (29%) underwent AVN ablation (+AVN-ABL group), whereas 109 (71%) received drug therapy for rate control during CRT (-AVN-ABL group). New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, electrocardiogram, and echocardiogram were assessed before and after CRT. Survival data were obtained from the national death and location database (Accurint). Results: CRT comparably improved left ventricular ejection fraction (8.1% ± 10.7% vs 6.8% ± 9.6%, P = .49) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (-2.1 ± 5.9 mm vs -2.1 ± 6.7 mm, P = .74) in both +AVN-ABL and -AVN-ABL groups. Improvement in NYHA class was significantly greater in the +AVN-ABL group than in -AVN-ABL group (-0.7 ± 0.8 vs -0.4 ± 0.8, P = .04). Survival estimates at 2 years were 96.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.6%100%) for +AVN-ABL group and 76.5% (95% CI 68.1%85.8%) forAVN-ABL group (P = .008). AVN ablation was independently associated with survival benefit from death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.13, 95% CI 0.030.58, P = .007) and from combined death, heart transplant, and left ventricular assist device (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.060.62, P = .006) after CRT. Conclusion: Among patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure receiving CRT, AVN ablation for definitive biventricular pacing provides greater improvement in NYHA class and survival benefit. Larger-scale randomized trials are needed to assess the clinical and survival outcomes of this therapy. © 2010 Heart Rhythm Society.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Correspondence Address: Cha, Y.-M.; Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States; email:ycha@mayo.edu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
请登录后发表评论,点击此处登录。
|
|
|
疾病资源中心
王燕燕 王曙
上海交通大学附属瑞金医院内分泌科
患者,女,69岁。2009年1月无明显诱因下出现乏力,当时程度较轻,未予以重视。2009年3月患者乏力症状加重,尿色逐渐加深,大便习惯改变,颜色变淡。4月18日入我院感染科治疗,诉轻度头晕、心慌,体重减轻10kg。无肝区疼痛,无发热,无腹痛、腹泻、腹胀、里急后重,无恶性、呕吐等。入院半月前于外院就诊,查肝功能:ALT 601IU/L,AST 785IU/L,TBIL 97.7umol/L,白蛋白 41g/L,甲状腺功能:游离T3 30.6pmol/L,游离T4 51.9pmol/L,心电图示快速房颤。
医学数据库
|