高级搜索
立即登录 | 免费注册
当前位置 >   首页 > 期刊文献 > 全球精选文摘 > 文摘导读
双侧深脑刺激与最佳医学治疗对晚期帕金森病患者疗效的比较:一项随机对照试验
Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation vs Best Medical Therapy for Patients With Advanced Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Weaver FM, Follett K, Stern M  2009/5/27 10:50:00 
【发表评论】 【全球专家评论】
打印| 推荐给好友

JAMA, 2009, Volume 301, Issue 1 
专家评级:
循证评级:
A

      View at Publisher

Context:
Deep brain stimulation is an accepted treatment for advanced Parkinson disease (PD), although there are few randomized trials comparing treatments, and most studies exclude older patients.

Objective:
To compare 6-month outcomes for patients with PD who received deep brain stimulation or best medical therapy.

Design, Setting, and Patients:
Randomized controlled trial of patients who received either deep brain stimulation or best medical therapy, stratified by study site and patient age (<70 years vs ≥70 years) at 7 Veterans Affairs and 6 university hospitals between May 2002 and October 2005. A total of 255 patients with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage ≥2 while not taking medications) were enrolled; 25% were aged 70 years or older. The final 6-month follow-up visit occurred in May 2006.

Intervention:
Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (n=60) or globus pallidus (n=61). Patients receiving best medical therapy (n=134) were actively managed by movement disorder neurologists.

Main Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome was time spent in the “on” state (good motor control with unimpeded motor function) without troubling dyskinesia, using motor diaries. Other outcomes included motor function, quality of life, neurocognitive function, and adverse events.

Results:
Patients who received deep brain stimulation gained a mean of 4.6h/d of on time without troubling dyskinesia compared with 0h/d for patients who received best medical therapy (between group mean difference, 4.5h/d [95% CI, 3.7-5.4h/d]; P<.001). Motor function improved significantly (P<.001) with deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy, such that 71% of deep brain stimulation patients and 32% of best medical therapy patients experienced clinically meaningful motor function improvements (≥5 points). Compared with the best medical therapy group, the deep brain stimulation group experienced significant improvements in the summary measure of quality of life and on 7 of 8 PD quality-of-life scores (P<.001). Neurocognitive testing revealed small decrements in some areas of information processing for patients receiving deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy. At least 1 serious adverse event occurred in 49 deep brain stimulation patients and 15 best medical therapy patients (P<.001), including 39 adverse events related to the surgical procedure and 1 death secondary to cerebral hemorrhage.

Conclusion:
In this randomized controlled trial of patients with advanced PD, deep brain stimulation was more effective than best medical therapy in improving on time without troubling dyskinesias, motor function, and quality of life at 6 months, but was associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events.

Trial Registration:
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00056563.
 

  评论

请登录后发表评论,点击此处登录。

疾病资源中心  疾病资源中心
病例分析 <span class="ModTitle_Intro_Right" id="EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div" onclick="javascript:window.location='http://www.elseviermed.cn/tabid/127/Default.aspx'" onmouseover="javascript:document.getElementById('EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div').style.cursor='pointer';document.getElementById('EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div').style.textDecoration='underline';" onmouseout="javascript:document.getElementById('EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div').style.textDecoration='none';">[栏目介绍]</span>  病例分析 [栏目介绍]

摘自:《西氏内科学》,第23

 

患者男性,36岁,幼年有吸入性肺损伤史,因呼吸急促和精神状态改变来我院就诊。患者睡眠和运动时,吸氧流量基值为2 L/min,每天均进行肺功能康复训练。患者居住在美国中西部,入院5天前曾离家乘船来这里看望其兄弟。入院前一天,患者呼吸急促加剧,自觉发热并注意到其慢性咳嗽稍加重,但痰液无变化。当天晚上,家人注意到患者更加急躁并有点偏执。由于症状加重,患者于次日送我院就诊。

医学数据库  医学数据库



友情链接:中文版柳叶刀 | MD CONSULT | Journals CONSULT | Procedures CONSULT | eClips CONSULT | Imaging CONSULT | 论文吧 | 世界医学书库 | 医心网

公司简介 | 用户协议 | 条件与条款 | 隐私权政策 | 网站地图 | 联系我们

 互联网药品信息服务资格证书 | 卫生局审核意见通知书 | 药监局行政许可决定书 
电信与信息服务业务经营许可证 | 京ICP证070259号 | 京ICP备09068478号

Copyright © 2009 Elsevier. All Rights Reserved.爱思唯尔版权所有



友情链接:中文版柳叶刀 | MD CONSULT | Journals CONSULT | Procedures CONSULT | eClips CONSULT | Imaging CONSULT | 论文吧 | 世界医学书库 | 医心网

公司简介 | 用户协议 | 条件与条款 | 隐私权政策 | 网站地图 | 联系我们

 互联网药品信息服务资格证书 | 卫生局审核意见通知书 | 药监局行政许可决定书 
电信与信息服务业务经营许可证 | 京ICP证070259号 | 京ICP备09068478号

Copyright © 2009 Elsevier. All Rights Reserved.爱思唯尔版权所有