贝伐单抗 vs. 雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的前瞻性随机试验
PURPOSE:
To compare visual acuity and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) outcomes associated with intravitreal (IV)bevacizumab vs IV ranibizumab for the management of diabetic macular edema (DME).
DESIGN:
Prospective randomized trial.
METHODS:
Forty-eight patients (63 eyes) with center-involved DME were randomly assigned to receive 1.5 mg (0.06 cc) IV bevacizumab or 0.5 mg (0.05 cc) IV ranibizumab at baseline and monthly if central subfield thickness was greater than 275 μm.
RESULTS:
Forty-five patients (60 eyes) completed 48 weeks of follow-up. At baseline, mean ± standard error best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (logMAR) was 0.60 (20/80) ± 0.05 in the IV bevacizumab group and 0.63 (20/85) ± 0.05 in the IV ranibizumab group. A significant improvement in mean BCVA was observed in both groups at all study visits (P < .05); this improvement was significantly greater in the IV ranibizumab group compared with the IV bevacizumab group at weeks 8 (P = .032) and 32 (P = .042). A significant reduction in mean central subfield thickness was observed in both groups at all study visits compared with baseline (P < .05), with no significant difference in the magnitude of macular thickness reduction between groups. The mean number of injections was significantly higher (P = .005) in the IV bevacizumab group (9.84) than in the IVranibizumab group (7.67).
CONCLUSIONS:
IV bevacizumab and IV ranibizumab are associated with similar effects on central subfield thickness in patients with DME through 1 year of follow-up. IV ranibizumab is associated with greater improvement in BCVA at some study visits, and the mean number of injections is higher in the IV bevacizumab group.
上一篇: 英夫利西单抗和免疫调节剂联合治疗减少炎症性肠病退伍军人患者的治疗起始后1年内住院率和手术率
下一篇: 洛匹那韦(利托那韦增效)联合核苷和核苷酸逆转录酶抑制剂 vs. 洛匹那韦(利托那韦增效)联合拉替拉韦治疗一线ART方案病毒学失败的成人HIV-1感染:一项随机、开放标记、非劣效性研究
- 您可能感兴趣的文章
-