放射学技术对震波碎石术的影响

Impact of Radiological Technologists on the Outcome of Shock Wave Lithotripsy
2012-09-26 12:06点击:58次发表评论
作者:"Mohamed A. Elkoushy, Douglas D. Morehouse, Mauric 【View at publisher】 【全球专家评论】
期刊: UROLOGY2012年1月4期79卷 专家评级: 循证评级:B

Objective:

To evaluate the correlation of radiological technologists (RTs) and the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in terms of fluoroscopy time, fragmentation rate, and stone-free rate.

Material and Methods:

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of 601 SWL treatments between June 2009 and March 2010 was performed. Patients with radiolucent stones were excluded. SWL was done by 6 RTs with different levels of experience. Follow up was available for 534 treatments. Multivariate analysis was performed.

Results:

RTs (A-F) performed 144, 109, 118, 58, 57, and 48 SWL sessions, respectively. There was no statistical difference among RTs in terms of mean stone size or stone location. Compared with other RTs, RT A had a significantly lower mean fluoroscopy time of 129 seconds (95% CI 120.8-137.3) (P<.001), higher stone-free rate (75.7%; P=.035), and stone fragmentation rate after a single SWL session (82.6%; P=.004). After correcting for stone size and location, fluoroscopy time (P<.001), fragmentation rate (P=.002), and stone-free rate (P=.04) maintained their significance. When comparing the top 3 RTs performing >100 SWL sessions, RTs B and C had significantly higher fluoroscopy time compared with RT A (OR [95% CI] 1.84 [1.38-2.45]; P<.001 and 2.67 [2.00-3.57]; P<.001), respectively. After correcting for stone size and location, RT B had significantly lower fragmentation rate when compared with RT A (OR [95% CI] 0.21 [0.05-0.86], P=.03]. However, there were no significant differences among the top 3 RTs in terms of stone-free rates.

Conclusion:

RTs significantly differ in fluoroscopy usage in addition to stone fragmentation and stone-free rates

学科代码:泌尿外科学   关键词:放射学技术对震波碎石术的影响
来源: Eclips
Eclips介绍:Eclips由权威专家阅读世界顶级医学期刊(包括New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, JAMA, BMJ 等)后筛选出最顶尖的文章,并总结、分级和点评,为繁忙的临床医生提供最快、最有效的前沿医学信息,并同时提供临床医生参与点评文献和同行互动交流的学术平台。 请点击申请试用并填写联系信息,我们将每月为前100位申请者发送带有用户名、密码及网页链接的电子邮件,请您注意查收!感谢您的参与及使用! 马上访问Eclips网站http://eclips.consult.com/
顶一下(0
您可能感兴趣的文章
    发表评论网友评论(0)
      发表评论
      登录后方可发表评论,点击此处登录