Elsevier.com | MedConnect.com.au | Medconnect.com.sg | Lancet.cn | JOA中文版

对用于评估成人臂丛创伤的量表的临床评价:系统综述

Clinimetric Evaluation of Questionnaires Used to Assess Activity After Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury in Adults: A Systematic Review
2012-06-20 17:19点击:16次发表评论
作者:Hill, B...E..., Williams, G..., Bialocerkowski, A. 【View at publisher】 【全球专家评论】
期刊: Arch Phys Med Rehabil2011年1月期卷 专家评级:★★ 循证评级:D

Objectives:To identify upper limb questionnaires used in the brachial plexus injury (BPI) literature to assess activities and to evaluate their clinimetric properties.  Data Sources; Study Selection; Data Extraction:This systematic review was undertaken in 2 stages. In stage 1, 10 electronic databases and 1 Internet journal were searched for quantitative studies (ie, randomized controlled trials, comparative studies, case series, and case studies) that evaluated outcome after BPI, irrespective of language or date of publication, from date of database inception to September 2010. All outcome instruments used were extracted and classified using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework. Questionnaires were identified that apportioned >50% of the total score to the assessment of upper limb activity. In stage 2, 4 electronic databases were searched for papers that evaluated the clinimetric properties of all identified activity questionnaires with respect to peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb. Two independent reviewers assessed the clinimetric properties of identified questionnaires according to standardized criteria.  Data Synthesis:Stage 1 identified 4324 papers, of which 265 met the inclusion criteria. One hundred and three outcome measures were identified, the majority of which assess body function or body structure. Twenty-nine questionnaires assessed upper limb activity. Two questionnaires, the ABILHAND and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), attributed >50% of the overall score to activity of the upper limb. The DASH had some published evidence of clinimetric properties in individuals with peripheral nerve injuries. Neither had been clinimetrically evaluated for BPI, nor met all quality criteria.  Conclusions:Day-to-day activities of the upper limb are infrequently evaluated after BPI. While attempts have been made to measure activity, there is a paucity of clinimetric evidence on activity questionnaires for individuals with BPI. We recommend that a core set of items be developed which evaluate activity, as well a body structure, body function, and participation.

学科代码:外科学   关键词:对用于评估成人臂丛创伤的量表的临床评价:系统综述
来源: Eclips
Eclips介绍:Eclips由权威专家阅读世界顶级医学期刊(包括New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, JAMA, BMJ 等)后筛选出最顶尖的文章,并总结、分级和点评,为繁忙的临床医生提供最快、最有效的前沿医学信息,并同时提供临床医生参与点评文献和同行互动交流的学术平台。 请点击申请试用并填写联系信息,我们将每月为前100位申请者发送带有用户名、密码及网页链接的电子邮件,请您注意查收!感谢您的参与及使用! 马上访问Eclips网站http://eclips.consult.com/
顶一下(0
您可能感兴趣的文章
    发表评论网友评论(0)
      发表评论
      登录后方可发表评论,点击此处登录
      友情链接: 中文版柳叶刀 | MD CONSULT | Journals CONSULT | Procedures CONSULT | eClips CONSULT  | Imaging CONSULT  
        好大夫   |  医师网  | 丁香园  | 论文吧  | 世界医学书库  | 好医生论坛  |  医心网  | 环球医学  | 白天使  | 医脉通 
      中华外科杂志  | 中国妇产科网  |  新青年麻醉论坛  | 杏树林  | 医学论坛网  | 春雨掌上医生  |协和青年之家