在行直接经皮冠脉介入的转运患者中,入诊室至出诊室时间(Door-In to Door-Out Time)与再灌注延迟和预后的关联

Association of Door-In to Door-Out Time With Reperfusion Delays and Outcomes Among Patients Transferred for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
作者:Wang Nallamothu Krumholz 【View at publisher】 【全球专家评论】
期刊: JAMA2012年1月期卷 专家评级: 循证评级:B

Context:Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requiring interhospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) often have prolonged overall door-to-balloon (DTB) times from first hospital presentation to second hospital PCI. Door-in to door-out (DIDO) time, defined as the duration of time from arrival to discharge at the first or STEMI referral hospital, is a new clinical performance measure, and a DIDO time of 30 minutes or less is recommended to expedite reperfusion care. Objective:To characterize time to reperfusion and patient outcomes associated with a DIDO time of 30 minutes or less. Design, Setting, and Patients:Retrospective cohort of 14 821 patients with STEMI transferred to 298 STEMI receiving centers for primary PCI in the ACTION Registry–Get With the Guidelines between January 2007 and March 2010. Main Outcome Measures:Factors associated with a DIDO time greater than 30 minutes, overall DTB times, and risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. Results:Median DIDO time was 68 minutes (interquartile range, 43-120 minutes), and only 1627 patients (11%) had DIDO times of 30 minutes or less. Significant factors associated with a DIDO time greater than 30 minutes included older age, female sex, off-hours presentation, and non–emergency medical services transport to the first hospital. Patients with a DIDO time of 30minutes or less were significantly more likely to have an overall DTB time of 90 minutes or less compared with patients with DIDO times greater than 30 minutes (60% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 57%-62%] vs 13% [95% CI, 12%-13%]; P<.001). Among patients with DIDO times greater than 30 minutes, only 0.6% (95% CI, 0.5%-0.8%) had an absolute contraindication to fibrinolysis. Observed in-hospital mortality was significantly higher among patients with DIDO times greater than 30 minutes vs patients with DIDO times of 30 minutes or less (5.9% [95% CI, 5.5%-6.3%] vs 2.7% [95% CI, 1.9%-3.5%]; P<.001; adjusted odds ratio for in-hospital mortality, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.15-2.12]). Conclusion:A DIDO time of 30 minutes or less was observed in only a small proportion of patients transferred for primary PCI but was associated with shorter reperfusion delays and lower in-hospital mortality.

学科代码:肾脏病学 急诊医学   关键词:
来源: 国际医学期刊
国际医学期刊介绍:信息来自于Pubmed,包括超过2100万出处生物医学文献来自Medline、生命科学期刊、在线书籍。引用内容链接到全文内容、公共医学中心和出版商的网站。 马上访问国际医学期刊网站http://www.pubmed.com/
顶一下(0
您可能感兴趣的文章
    发表评论网友评论(0)
      发表评论
      登录后方可发表评论,点击此处登录